Alaska/BC Cut Chinook Harvests

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fish Frontiers
  • Start date Start date
F

Fish Frontiers

Guest
Hey, guys!
We just got this in yesterday and posted it on Fish Frontiers. It looks like more cutbacks are on the way for both Alaska and BC in regards to Chinook harvest. Alaska is cutting Chinook harvest by 15% over the next 10 years and BC is cutting harvest by 30%. Who knows what goes on behind closed doors, but maybe Tofinofishing knows something about this.

Here's the story:
http://fishfrontiers.com/blogs/index.cfm?bloggerid=news&blogid=103
 
Deal would cut salmon catch by 30 per cent

Sandra McCulloch
Times Colonist


Friday, May 23, 2008


A new agreement between Canada and the U.S. would cut the harvest of chinook salmon off the west coast of Vancouver Island by 30 per cent for a decade, starting in 2009.

The Pacific Salmon Commission announced yesterday it has recommended a bilateral agreement aimed at conservation and sharing of Pacific salmon between the two countries.

It includes $7.5 million from both countries over five years to improve a system for tagging fish. The tagging process helps monitor fish stocks. The U.S. would also pay $30 million to Canada to lessen the impact off Vancouver Island.

The deal was struck after 18 months of negotiation and requires final approval of the Canadian and U.S. governments.

An agreement in principle announced yesterday came about without the acrimony of an agreement in 1999, said Don Kowal, executive secretary of the commission.

"We did make a major step forward in that we didn't have to hire a special negotiator," Kowal said by telephone from Vancouver.

The biggest change is the section of the agreement that covers chinook salmon, which are harvested in waters off Alaska, B.C., Washington and Oregon. Chinook are difficult to manage because of the multiple age-classes in the ocean at any one time, the variety of migratory patterns and diverse life histories, said a commission background document.

Some chinook stocks are healthy and productive while others are so depressed the U.S. government has declared them to be endangered.

While the chinook fishery will be cut by 30 per cent off the Island, the fishery off Alaska will be cut by 15 per cent. The measures are intended to allow a million more chinook to return to hatcheries and spawning grounds in Puget Sound.

The deal got a lukewarm response from Jeffery Young, an aquatic biologist with the David Suzuki Foundation.

"We were hoping for a better emphasis on using information in season to base fisheries decisions on," Young said.

"It's a somewhat antiquated treaty and they've tweaked it a bit in the right direction, but they never really updated it in a way that makes it robust for the long term."

The Sportfishing Alliance applauded the deal, saying it will stabilize the industry for the future. "Canada and our fisheries resource will be far better off because of what has been achieved here," said alliance president Bill Otway.

If approved, the new deal will be in effect from 2009 to the end of 2018.

smcculloch@tc.canwest.com

© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2008
 
Ultimately this will put more fish into Vancouver Island waters. Area G troll will bear the brunt of the 30% cutback. In the treaty the US has put forward a huge sum of cash to make the cutback less painfull for the fleet. This is a good deal for recreational fishers in British Columbia.
 
Correct me if i'm wrong , but way back in 1997 David Anderson
who was minister at the time declared a moratorium on commercial
harvest of Chinook and Coho.
Has that changed since ?
 
Hats off to BC for putting sportfishing first. I have a feeling sportfisherman in Alaska won't be so lucky with the new cuts, but time will tell. Either way this is good for the fish and should put more fish back on the redds up and down the coast, providing some stabilization for Chinook runs in the years to come.

Rob Endsley
www.fishfrontiers.com
 
"The Canadians' agreed reduction is from the allowed catch, even though they have caught all the fish allocated to them only two years between 1999 and 2006." This appears to be an allocation reduction as opposed to a captured count reduction which I would think would benefit the sportsman.
 
Its all good, sort of. Some will recall the 130,000 WCVI Chinook bycatch last season in Alaska. This deal puts a cap on that type of activity and gives the lower US states some protection against Alaskan over-fishing. For years the Alsakan's have thumbed their noses up at everyone to the south, thwarting any efforts by us to get fish back into our rivers. This is a good deal overall, and I agree that the sportfishing community will ultimately benefit......however, expect that this will bring quotas and management of the fishery in much the same fashion as we are seeing at the moment with Halibut. We will now be working toward allocation numbers, which will impact sport fisheries in years of lower abundance. So, my caution is don't be fooled into thinking this will not mean some form of reduction as necessary to meet a quota agreement.
 
We fished amidst the sea of seiners all last summer in SE Alaska and couldn't figure out why they were getting 5 days a week in late July and August. They called it an "All Out Effort" and even the seiners were wondering why the openings were so long. Of course, that didn't stop them from fishing and I'm sure a good chunk of those 130,000 fish went into their nets.

Which begs another question, how on earth do you catch 130,000 too many fish? That's criminal!

Rob Endsley
www.fishfrontiers.com
 
Back
Top