Sockeye fishery faces closure.

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
Commercial sockeye fishery faces closure on North Coast
42559princerupertsockeye.contributed.WilsonHuiFlickr.jpg

If the Department of Fisheries and Oceans were using a Magic 8 Ball to determine the future of sockeye salmon fishery in the Skeena the answer would be — Outlook Not So Good.

Early forecasts for sockeye salmon are poor and there is a possibility there won’t be a commercial fishery for the year.

“We’re facing a really challenging year,” said Colin Masson, DFO’s area director for the North Coast.

The forecasts are based on the sockeye that went to sea in 2014 and 2015, as well as the number of sockeye jacks, the premature fish who return a year early. Both indicators suggest the outlook is not good.

For DFO to plan commercial fisheries, the total return of sockeye has to be greater than 1.05 million.

“If it’s less than that then we don’t plan commercial fisheries,” Masson said after he laid out the numbers.

Pre-season total return to Canada was estimated at 590,000, and that is a mid-point estimate, it could be much lower. To put those numbers into perspective, the sockeye total escapement target for the Skeena River is 900,000.

Where it gets complicated is the wide range of DFO’s estimates, where the low-point estimate goes as low as 250,000 and the high-point is 1.25 million. For planning purposes, they use a 50 per cent probability rate, which is where they get the estimated return at 590,000.

Since the levels are low, DFO has been collaborating with First Nations in the Fraser and the approach areas to develop options on sharing arrangements amongst the indigenous communities.

“We’re looking at other things. Maybe alternate species to focus on other than sockeye. Those discussions are ongoing. There are no conclusions reached at this point,” Masson said.

As for the canneries, Canfisco vice-president of production and corporate development, Rob Morely, said they haven’t had much sockeye in the last few years.

“It clearly has an impact on all our gill-net fishermen being able to make a living and it reduces the amount of product in the plants. Not a question, it’ll impact the volume of product going through plant,” Morely said.

Forecasts can be off though, maybe even enough to have a window for a fishery. In 2016, the sockeye return was 1.48 million and the forecast was for 1.28 million.

But when DFO held its North Coast salmon post-season review in November, experts presented an ongoing patter of low sockeye productivity and that 2017 may be as bad as 2013.

In 2013, sockeye returns were estimated at 453,000 — a historic low in the Skeena River — and DFO closed both commercial and non-indigenous recreational fisheries.

The integrated salmon management plan for this year is still being drafted. If sockeye numbers are as low as they’re predicting, Masson said that DFO is looking to have some contingency plans in place.

There will also be more consultation with recreational and commercial fishermen to develop a plan and possibly make adjustments to the fishery.
 
Same forecasts pretty much for Alberni and I believe the Fraser... :(

I think there is still a chance to be optimistic for the Fraser, If it falls in the P50 Rang will have a decent fishery. If it is in the P25 rang it will be shut down.
 
2017 is the lowest year of the sockeye cycle for the Fraser, next year is the big one.
 
If the Department of Fisheries and Oceans were using a Magic 8 Ball to determine the future of sockeye salmon fishery in the Skeena the answer would be — Outlook Not So Good.

Early forecasts for sockeye salmon are poor and there is a possibility there won’t be a commercial fishery for the year.

“We’re facing a really challenging year,” said Colin Masson, DFO’s area director for the North Coast.

The forecasts are based on the sockeye that went to sea in 2014 and 2015, as well as the number of sockeye jacks, the premature fish who return a year early. Both indicators suggest the outlook is not good.

"IF"
I thought the Magic 8 Ball was their primary forecast tool. :)
 
2017 is the lowest year of the sockeye cycle for the Fraser, next year is the big one.

Do you have any evidence to support this because when i look at the cycle of past returns 2012/2016 looks like its been the worst years. IT was a ****** year in 2009 but it 2013 it recovered a lot.

index.php
 
1993 was a big year. 18 million, many were Quesnel Lake I think. 2017-1993 = 24 24/6 = 4 fingers crossed.
 
Do you have any evidence to support this because when i look at the cycle of past returns 2012/2016 looks like its been the worst years. IT was a ****** year in 2009 but it 2013 it recovered a lot.

I know 2009 was so bad it triggered a public enquiry (which was released just as 2010 was breaking all records, haha). Clearly the dominant year in the cycle is the 1998-2002-2006-2010-2014 series - Winter Olympics years is how I remember it. The other years aren't as consistent and don't really have much of a pattern. Thanks for finding and posting that table.
 
Clearly the dominant year in the cycle is the 1998-2002-2006-2010-2014 series

Those years were all Adams River run, ie. the largest component of the escapement for that year. I'm wondering if that Polley Ck. incident messed up our Adams River run of Sockeye. Second to the Skeena, these fish are the biggest (I've counted up to 7 lb average in some commercial catches) and finest eating.
 
I guess it's possible, but the dilution would have been considerable by the time the tailings spill reached any of the Adams fish. Somewhere there must be escapement counts for 2014 for the Adams, that might show if there was significant mortality of this run back on the lower Fraser.
 
Back
Top