Rec Boaters having big effect on herring survival

tincan

Well-Known Member
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Po...+Creek+herring+population/10240095/story.html

Pollution thwarts efforts to restore False Creek herring population

Study finds recreational vessels larger polluters than oil tankers and cargo ships

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Po...+population/10240095/story.html#ixzz3EuHjN5td


This year, for the first time in decades, millions of herring spawned in False Creek.

An estimated 10 to 20 million herring — a foundation food for salmon and whales — survived as eggs on a synthetic stand-in for natural eelgrass habitat that Jonn Matsen and the Squamish Streamkeepers developed and wrapped around creosote-soaked pilings in Vancouver’s waters.

But an equal number of eggs died before they could hatch, apparently poisoned by the same type of persistent pollutants that a new study out of the University of Calgary found to be a larger threat to the Pacific coast than oil tankers and cargo ships.

According to the study, oil seeping out of recreational boats, fishing vessels, and commercial cruise ships, as well as fuel leaks associated with private marinas, account for more pollution along the B.C. coast than oil discharged from tankers and transport ships.

Stefania Bertazzon, the lead author of the study and an associate professor of geography at the University of Calgary, used a novel method to measure oily substances spilled along the B.C. coast and then determine their likely source.

She and the other researchers relied on observational data gathered from 2008 to 2010 by remote sensors attached to aircraft flown by the National Aerial Surveillance Program, which monitors pollution along the coast.

But that data was only a starting point.

“The aircraft are only detecting the spills in a certain space. Then we come into the game and we tested the association between the oil spills and the marine traffic at each location,” she said.

The team then divided the coastal waters into 25-square-kilometre cells and figured out what type of vessels used that space.

“For each of these cells, we knew how many hours were spent there by each type of vessel,” she said.

The method has its drawbacks, Bertazzon noted. Speed of travel, for example, could reduce the apparent impact of some types of vessels in certain waters.

“We are also aware that the big tankers and cargo ships are more regulated. They have to undergo several inspections and they are aware of the overhead surveillance, so they know how to behave,” she said. “There may be a lot of reasons why some types of vessels get caught more.”

Bertazzon said it was clear from the data that more spills happen close to the shore, and many unintentional spills occur in the vicinity of marinas where boats are docking and refuelling.

“I think people could be more careful,” she said.

Pollutants from marinas and recreational boaters are a major hurdle for Matsen and the Streamkeepers in their bid to revive False Creek as a herring spawning ground.

When Douglas Swanston, a Streamkeepers diver and marine biologist, tested the herring eggs earlier this year, he found half had died, something Matsen and others attributed to the eggs’ exposure to surface-level oil, fuel and creosote that had leached from dock piles.

“All these marinas have a little oil slick on the surface that goes up and down with the tide, so the upper half of the eggs pretty much got killed off,” said Matsen.

There are consequences further up the food chain for large predators like salmon, and in turn, recreational and commercial fishers.

“Everybody wants a nice, protected place to put their boats so they can go catch fish somewhere else,” he said. “They don’t realize they just damaged another big chunk of the environment. Pretty soon you have to go way, way (out) to catch fish.”

The Streamkeepers have also been working to restore the herring population under the Squamish Terminals dock, where freighters are closely monitored.

Matsen said nearly 100 per cent of the herring eggs in those waters successfully hatch out.

Bertazzon said the study — titled Geospatial analysis of oil discharges observed by the National Aerial Surveillance Program in the Canadian Pacific Ocean — appears to be the only attempt to associate oil spills and maritime pursuits.

mrobinson@vancouversun.com

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Po...+population/10240095/story.html#ixzz3EuHd0Gt0
 
I've read the U of Calgary study it'a all pro Big Oil and anti everything else -read it yourself and she how the author fawns over oil tankers.

In addition millions of Herring have been spawning in False Creek since time immemorial-I see them there all the time- they didn't just appear because some god like biologist waved his blessed wand.

Environmental conditions mean that survival rates are poor and the situation is a work in progress but no one should swallow this line of lying bull without having an objective look @ the real state of affairs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree Dogbreath. Nice way to steal a great success storey by the Squamish Streamkeepers and twist it to look like recreational boats are bad and freighters are good. "This year, for the first time in decades, millions of herring spawned in False Creek". Only Big Oil would try and form Public Opinion in this way. I have practically gagged on the rot coming out of those Freighter Smokestacks and so although they might be "closely monitored" in Port they are certainly not closely Regulated for Pollution. Congratulations to the StreamKeepers and hopefully they can build on their success.
 
I didn't find the report or the Vancouver Sun story pro Big Oil at all nor did I find it applauded oil tankers saying that they are angels. Should we be led to believe that the general public are just some innocent bystanders with oil discharges? I imagine most if not all those little spills that people think are insignificant go unreported. Should be a bit of a wake-up call. I think we should put away the home team jerseys and perhaps take a hard look at our own activities instead of instantly dismissing the message this report delivers.

What is disappointing is that we want scientists in this country to do this type of work, but when the results do not align with certain opinions we are not willing to try and listen or be objective about this and perhaps see it from another perspective. Turning on the study and the authors like vicious dogs and painting them as corrupt actually makes the accusers look bad (IMO), especially when the only critique is directed at the author's professionalism. This work is helping to assist our monitoring of these discharges - that should be a good thing. Remember, this study doesn't remove responsibility from things like oil tankers or other polluters. You can still hate oil tankers if that is your goal, but the study reminds us that we need to do a better job ourselves on preventing or reducing oil discharges. How is that a bad thing?

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622814000800
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the difference in perception of the impact and recommendations from this study stem from the press releases - NOT the science - as friggen usual.

The science - after skimming the report - is not earth-shattering saying there are unreported oily discharges.

Ok - so what? What does that mean? Should we do anything different? The peer-reviewed report really is pretty quiet on those questions.

As far as I can see - the report says that birds can be impacted from oily discharges. Ok - how many? Is it affecting sea bird numbers? Is it something we should worry about? Just a general assumption in the report that all oily discharges are bad - and bad for birds. Maybe. Maybe not.

IF we are talking bout things like cancer and immunosuppression - the PAH component of oil (high PAH levels in bunker and dilbit) is important to assess. Chronic exposure to this kind of oil discharge would be of concern. in Valdez there was a massive multiyear herring die-off from VHS caused largely by immunosuppression from residual oil. No word on oil discharge composition in the report.

Where birds (and bird colonies) are in relation to these modelled oily discharges also not discussed. The fate and weathering of these oily discharges also not discussed.

The media, however - seems to want to explain that the chronic release/exposure of these oily discharges are maybe even more deleterious that accidental releases by oil shipping. Why is that? The report authors do not attempt to assume that - just that the unreported ones are numerous - and no attempt to estimate potential negative effects other than bland assumptions w/o any details or proof.

Seems that any recommendations from this report are being vetted in the media, rather than the report. Why is that (open question to the forum readership)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In addition to Agentaqua's detailed criticism of the sloppy way this study was framed I'd also like to point out that many of the marinas in question are only full for half the year-as many here know but the study author does not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, Shuswap. Although meant to be just a geospatial analysis, it's a good reminder to all that when one points a finger, there are always three pointing back.
Nearshore operational dscharges include storm water run off-another side effect of our petroleum based society which might be having more of an impact in False Creek than in Squamish. Also, not likely to be too many marinas built in the vicinity of Triangle Island in the near future.
Finally, I agree with Aqent when he questions the lack of analysis of the fate of these operational discharges by the study authors.
 
I read through the scientific manuscript (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622814000800). IMHO, the biggest shortcoming of the work is that the modeling makes the implicit assumption that the observed oily discharges in the marine waters can be attributed solely to marine traffic and marine variables. E.g. the modeling is done only using predictor variables that include characteristics of the study areas, the marinas and boats within the study areas but not factors such as population density on the land in near the marine study areas, effects of rain etc. Hence when they find a significant correlation between oily "discharges" (really oil observed in the water) and recreational or other types of boats, it's possible that the correlation is due to more recreational boating in areas where land based sources of pollution are high. E.g. there is likely more recreational boating in areas of higher population density and oil from cars, rain washing road oil into the water etc is likely to be higher and positively correlated with the variable of recreational boating. Ditto for other sources of marine traffic. Since potential land based sources of the oily "discharges" were not included in the modeling, it's entirely possible the the observed correlations do not point to causality between the marine activities and the "discharges". Even the language of "discharges" is somewhat misleading since all that is really measured is oil in the water and the source and timing thereof is unknown to the instrumentation.
 
If you REALLY want to have a big effect on herring survival, knock down the annual commie harvest tonnages in the strait of Georgia. You can chase all the bad boaters in every little nook and cranny in the strait, but nothing would have the impact of a reduced take by the commies. Want to see the Strait of Georgia come alive again with Salmon, Killer whales, dolphins, eagles, sea lions, seals, and all other forms of wildlife? Stop killing the feedstock that turns zooplankton into consumable biomass........:mad:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you REALLY want to have a big effect on herring survival, knock down the annual commie harvest tonnages in the strait of Georgia. You can chase all the bad boaters in every little nook and cranny in the strait, but nothing would have the impact of a reduced take by the commies. Want to see the Strait of Georgia come alive again with Salmon, Killer whales, dolphins, eagles, sea lions, seals, and all other forms of wildlife? Stop killing the feedstock that turns zooplankton into consumable biomass........:mad:

Too funny. Started with the cumulative effect of oil discharged in and around marinas and rather then accepting a hint of responsibility you ended up at "close the commercial fishery". ignorance is bliss I suppose.
 
If you REALLY want to have a big effect on herring survival, knock down the annual commie harvest tonnages in the strait of Georgia. You can chase all the bad boaters in every little nook and cranny in the strait, but nothing would have the impact of a reduced take by the commies. Want to see the Strait of Georgia come alive again with Salmon, Killer whales, dolphins, eagles, sea lions, seals, and all other forms of wildlife? Stop killing the feedstock that turns zooplankton into consumable biomass........:mad:
I wouldn't close the commercial fishery necessarily - but I would instead advocate for drastic changes in management with more ecosystem-based biomass levels and more acceptance/acknowledgement of meta-populations of herring - rather than the way DFO insists it be done currently - which is Gail Shae's way or the highway. The courts agreed with this assessment of the inadequacies of herring management, and gave FN an injunction this year - another legal precedent and indictment of the failure of DFO and corruption/collusion in the minor royalty that is used to commanding us peons. Shae even went against advice internally from DFO (see attached jpgs of internal briefing notes). She is also a big supporter of open net-pen aquaculture, as well.
 

Attachments

  • 1-796dce1d55.jpg
    1-796dce1d55.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 169
  • 2-6ce7102103a.jpg
    2-6ce7102103a.jpg
    107 KB · Views: 170
  • 3-3b7ce3ef65.jpg
    3-3b7ce3ef65.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 169
  • 4-d2188219e7.jpg
    4-d2188219e7.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 171
  • 5-d1a388b796.jpg
    5-d1a388b796.jpg
    81.6 KB · Views: 169
  • 6-e3cf44763c.jpg
    6-e3cf44763c.jpg
    66.8 KB · Views: 170
Last edited by a moderator:
Too funny. Started with the cumulative effect of oil discharged in and around marinas and rather then accepting a hint of responsibility you ended up at "close the commercial fishery". ignorance is bliss I suppose.
Read again 69er. I did not say close the fishery. In fact i was pretty clear about reducing it, not closing it. In addition to that where do you jump to the conclusion that my suggestion of reducing the commie take of herring in the strait of Georgia turns into ignorance of the issues of marinas around the strait? Rather than define my comments as ignorant, perhaps you should take issue with my comment directly. Or would you prefer just to continue to jump to conclusions and not actually read what people write?
 
IF we are talking bout things like cancer and immunosuppression - the PAH component of oil (high PAH levels in bunker and dilbit) is important to assess. Chronic exposure to this kind of oil discharge would be of concern... No word on oil discharge composition in the report.
Potent Phototoxicity of Marine Bunker Oil to Translucent Herring Embryos after Prolonged Weathering
John P. Incardona1*, Carol A. Vines2, Tiffany L. Linbo1, Mark S. Myers1, Catherine A. Sloan1, Bernadita F. Anulacion1, Daryle Boyd1, Tracy K. Collier1¤, Steven Morgan2, Gary N. Cherr2,3, Nathaniel L. Scholz1
1 Environmental Conservation Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 2 University of California-Davis Bodega Marine Laboratory, Bodega Bay, California, United States of America, 3 Departments of Environmental Toxicology and Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
Abstract
Pacific herring embryos (Clupea pallasi) spawned three months following the Cosco Busan bunker oil spill in San Francisco Bay showed high rates of late embryonic mortality in the intertidal zone at oiled sites. Dead embryos developed to the hatching stage (e.g. fully pigmented eyes) before suffering extensive tissue deteriora tion. In contrast, embryos incubated subtidally at oiled sites showed evidence of sublethal oil exposure (petroleum-induced cardiac toxicity) with very low rates of mortality. These field findings suggested an enhancement of oil toxicity through an interaction between oil and another environmental stressor in the intertidal zone, such as higher levels of sunlight-derived ultraviolet (UV) radiation. We tested this hypothesis by exposing herring embryos to both trace levels of weathered Cosco Busan bunker oil and sunlight, with and without protection from UV radiation. Cosco Busan oil and UV co-exposure were both necessary and sufficient to induce an acutely lethal necrotic syndrome in hatching stage embryos that closely mimicked the condition of dead embryos sampled from oiled sites. Tissue levels of known phototoxic polycyclic aromatic compounds were too low to explain the observed degree of phototoxicity, indicating the presence of other unidentified or unmeasured phototoxic compounds derived from bunker oil. These findings provide a parsimonious explanation for the unexpectedly high losses of intertidal herring spawn following the Cosco Busan spill. The chemical composition and associated toxicity of bunker oils should be more thoroughly evaluated to better understand and anticipate the ecological impacts of vessel-derived spills associated with an expanding global transportation network.
Citation: Incardona JP, Vines CA, Linbo TL, Myers MS, Sloan CA, et al. (2012) Potent Phototoxicity of Marine Bunker Oil to Translucent Herring Embryos after Prolonged Weathering. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030116
Editor: Howard Browman, Institute of Marine Research, Norway
Received October 17, 2011; Accepted December 9, 2011; Published February 1, 2012
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Funding: All funding for this work was provided by the Natural Resource Damage Assessment process, obtained from the Cosco Busan oil spill Responsible Party by Federal and California State co-Trustees under the authority of the US Clean Water and Oil Pollution Acts. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
* E-mail: john.incardona@noaa.gov
¤ Current address: Oceans and Human Health Initiative, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030116
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IF we are talking bout things like cancer and immunosuppression - the PAH component of oil (high PAH levels in bunker and dilbit) is important to assess. Chronic exposure to this kind of oil discharge would be of concern. in Valdez there was a massive multiyear herring die-off from VHS caused largely by immunosuppression from residual oil.
http://pwssc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Herring-synthesis.pdf
http://www.evostc.state.ak.us/Store/FinalReports/1998-98162-Final.pdf
http://www.evostc.state.ak.us/Store/FinalReports/1999-99162B-Final.pdf
https://scholars.duke.edu/display/pub776857
http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/65/1/44.full.pdf
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11160-011-9225-7.pdf
 
http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/2013 VHS Virus in farmed S to wild herring.pdf
Experimental infection studies demonstrating Atlantic salmon as a host and reservoir of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus type IVa with insights into pathology and host immunity
J. Lovy a,b, *, P. Piesik b, P.K. Hershberger c, K.A. Garver b
a Herring Conservation & Research Society, 1-5765 Turner Road, Suite 403, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6M4, Canada b Pacific Biological Station, 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada cU.S. Geological Survey
Abstract
In British Columbia, Canada (BC), aquaculture of finfish in ocean netpens has the potential for pathogen transmission between wild and farmed species due to the sharing of an aquatic environment. Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) is enzootic in BC and causes serious disease in wild Pacific herring, Clupea pallasii, which often enter and remain in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, netpens. Isolation of VHSV from farmed Atlantic salmon has been previously documented, but the effects on the health of farmed salmon and the wild fish sharing the environment are unknown. To determine their susceptibility, Atlantic salmon were exposed to a pool of 9 isolates of VHSV obtained from farmed Atlantic salmon in BC by IP-injection or by waterborne exposure and cohabitation with diseased Pacific herring. Disease intensity was quantified by recording mortality, clinical signs, histopathological changes, cellular sites of viral replication, expression of interferon-related genes, and viral tissue titers. Disease ensued in Atlantic salmon after both VHSV exposure methods. Fish demonstrated gross disease signs including darkening of the dorsal skin, bilateral exophthalmia, light cutaneous hemorrhage, and lethargy. The virus replicated within endothelial cells causing endothelial cell necrosis and extensive hemorrhage in anterior kidney. Infected fish demonstrated a type I interferon response as seen by up-regulation of genes for IFNα, Mx, and ISG15. In a separate trial infected salmon transmitted the virus to sympatric Pacific herring. The results demonstrate that farmed Atlantic salmon can develop clinical VHS and virus can persist in the tissues for at least 10 weeks. Avoiding VHS epizootics in Atlantic salmon farms would limit the potential of VHS in farmed Atlantic salmon, the possibility for further host adaptation in this species, and virus spillback to sympatric wild fishes.
Published by Elsevier B.V.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...atens-salmon-scientist-warns/article13722113/

"Dr. Marty said limited outbreaks of the two diseases are not necessarily a bad thing.

“In some respect for the population it’s actually good to have small outbreaks, often because even though it may kill a few individual fish, the survivors are then immune from the disease and actually the population can be stronger as a result,” he said."

Yet - on the paper he was the lead author of: Gary D. Marty, Terrance J. Quinn II, Greg Carpenter, Theodore R. Meyers, and
Neil H. Willits, 2003, Role of disease in abundance of a Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) population, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60: 1258–1265 (2003) - it states on p.1263: "The best population model provides evidence that disease impairs recruitment."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...se-gaps-exposed-in-government-email-1.2814468

B.C. oil spill response 'gaps' exposed in government email
Gaps found or improvements needed for 'hundreds of spills on an annual basis'
CBC News Posted: Oct 27, 2014 12:04 PM PT Last Updated: Oct 27, 2014 12:04 PM PT

In July 2007, a construction crew ruptured a Kinder Morgan pipeline carrying crude from the tank farm to a tanker facility on Burrard Inlet on the north side of Burnaby Mountain. About 234,000 litres of oil shot 30 metres into the air for about 25 minutes, covering some nearby homes, and oozing into Burrard Inlet.
In July 2007, a construction crew ruptured a Kinder Morgan pipeline carrying crude from the tank farm to a tanker facility on Burrard Inlet on the north side of Burnaby Mountain. About 234,000 litres of oil shot 30 metres into the air for about 25 minutes, covering some nearby homes, and oozing into Burrard Inlet. (CBC)

3 shares

Facebook

Twitter

Reddit

Google

Share

Email
Related Stories

Tailings pond spill: What happens to effluent over time
Oil spill risk addressed by West Coast tanker safety report
Crude oil proposals create 'very high' B.C. coast risk
Kinder Morgan pipeline spill simulation to predict environmental risk
British Columbia's oil spill response has come under scrutiny after the emergence of an email between high-ranking staff at the Ministry of Environment referring to "hundreds of spills on an annual basis where gaps occurred or improvements are needed."

The heavily redacted email, which was discovered by the NDP as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) request, was sent on March 31 by Graham Knox, head of B.C.'s Environmental Emergency Program, to Jim Hofweber, executive director of the province's Environmental Emergencies and Land Remediation Branch.

Several incidents are mentioned where an effective response was considered lacking, including one from a Kinder Morgan pipeline spill at their Sumas Tank farm where, "no air monitoring or sampling was done to determine what the concentrations of chemicals in the air".

According to the email, Kinder Morgan assured the public there were no health impacts from the spill despite having no scientific evidence to back those claims up, and in the face of community complaints of "nausea, headaches, strong odours, etc."

Areas of concern raised included the effectiveness of spill reporting, the training and certification of responders, data collection and monitors, environmental restoration and compensation of loss of public use.

Under the compensation category, reference was made to the Burnaby Kinder Morgan pipeline spill and the closure of numerous parks and beaches for a "significant" time period.

The email notes that no monetary compensation was provided to the community for this loss of access, and that should a future spill encroach on U.S. land as well as B.C., the public on the American side of the border would be entitled to compensation.

A section headed 'capability and capacity" was entirely redacted.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documen...rector-of-environmental-emergency-program.pdf
 
Back
Top