trophywife
Crew Member
open thread to halibut comments. bring it. i quite like reading the opinions and effects. the other thread got closed.
We already did that survey and the sfab halibut working group didn’t listen…. LololNo one is happy... i would suggest for all of you that are not a member of your area that you fish perhaps join... u dont have to show up to any meeting if don't want too. HOWEVER to become a voting member of the sfac you need to 2 in person meeting . That being said you should be receiving all the sfab stuff that is sent out the the chairs of the sfac which they should be distributing to all there sfac members. With the halibut allocation being down and looking like this trend is continuing I believe the sfab will be sending out a halibut survey for the sfac members this fall . Where you will be able to give your input on perhaps how you want the 2026 season roll.. remember it would be a guide to the halibut working group to shape that season.
I wasn't a fan of the halibut decision and for my area in Nanaimo most of us fish WCVI for halibut. So for this area we would have been fine for core months open. June to August. That would allowed for a bigger fish.
2) Shorter core season - with larger fish. (cutting out early/late season until we gain reduction necessary to fit available TAC)
We already did that survey and the sfab halibut working group didn’t listen…. Lolol
I think I'm hearing we need a re-set. A lot of people who are regular participants in their local SFAC did not seem to know about the survey. We might need to step back and take another look at various ways to gather input. That's why I posed 2 different approaches - one to do another general survey out to all the local SFAC members or an alternative, which is just to have each local SFAC meet and debate what works best for them and each SFAC carries forward one selection or maybe even ranks them in terms of first, second and third preference. That way we have a broader sense of what people across the coast really value and want out of their halibut fishery - rather than guess or let those who play politics the loudest carry the day.I don't think its that simple, its one thing when DFO closes one area to keep another open, but the SFAB doing that is different imo
this can be done with salmon too but my understanding the the SFAB has had a long understanding not to go down that path. They could for example keep area 12 closed to keep area 13 open earlier/longer.
salmon they generally target the areas with the largest exploitation rates for the at stock risk stock but it does not need to be done that way.
I remember the south coast sfab chair shutting down a conversation right away that strayed in this direction. "when dfo said if you want this area open then you have to close another"
YesView attachment 115658
In the attached table it notes “Net Wt”. This may be a stupid question but when I look at a length to weight chart, Net Wt means dressed with head off,,,so are the numbers in the table and our TAC number dressed, head off weights????