chemical dyes applied to farmed salmon

fishingbc

Active Member
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT REVERSES LOWER COURT'S JUDGMENT IN FARM RAISED SALMON CASES

Contact: Kevin Golden, Center for Food Safety, (415) 826-2770; John Bianchi, Goodman Media, (212) 576-2700

Center for Food Safety Applauds the Decision, which Vindicates Consumers' Right to Know

Washington, DC February 12, 2008 - The Supreme Court of the State of California yesterday issued a decision in the Farm Raised Salmon Cases (under the umbrella listing S147171), overturning a California Court of Appeal ruling. California citizens sued various grocery stores alleging the stores violated California's Sherman Law labeling requirements by selling artificially colored farmed salmon without labeling it as "color added" as required by law.

Attorney Kevin Golden of the Center for Food Safety (which filed a Friend of the Court brief in this case) said, "We applaud the California Supreme Courts ruling. At issue is whether the people of California have the right to know what's in their food. California citizens' right to enforce California food safety law, where the federal government is failing to do its job, has been vindicated."

The suits - filed against several California grocery chains - were most recently dismissed by the California Court of Appeal, which ruled that federal labeling law preempts citizen enforcement of equivalent California state laws aimed at protecting human health and safety. The California Supreme Court's ruling concluded that the lower courts erred in taking away the citizens' right to enforce California's crucial food safety law.

The suit focused on two chemical dyes applied to farmed salmon sold in supermarkets (without the pink dyes, the farmed fish would have appeared grey in color). The artificial dyes, canthaxanthin and astaxanthin, pose significant health risks. These dyes have been linked to several human health problems, including impaired vision and retinal damage, cancer, and hyperactivity in young children.

"This ruling represents a significant win for consumers," continued Golden. "It increases accountability in the food industry to the people of the state, and it empowers individual consumers to demand accurate and honest labeling on the food they feed their families. The California Supreme Court has affirmed the consumers' right to know what's in their food."
 
Wow...I didn't realize there were health risks involved with the dyes used.

I will have to find the article, but there was a related, even more dangerous problem in thailand where people were catching blowfish (which are poisonous unless filleted correctly), adding dye, and selling them as salmon. People were dying and they finally linked it to people misrepresenting the blowfish as salmon.
 
On the farmed fish health topic, I was talking to a coworker a while back that used to work at a BC environmental lab doing some kind testing both wild and farm fish for pollutants.

I won't pretend to understand half of it but she said that the PCBs and other cancer causing pollution found in the fat of both fish concludes that we shouldn't be eating it more than twice per month - and she said never, ever eat farmed fish, which I don't. Apparently the PCBs are fat sollueable and dissolve into the same fats that the Omega 3's are found. GRoss.
 
quote:Originally posted by Nimo

On the farmed fish health topic, I was talking to a coworker a while back that used to work at a BC environmental lab doing some kind testing both wild and farm fish for pollutants.

I won't pretend to understand half of it but she said that the PCBs and other cancer causing pollution found in the fat of both fish concludes that we shouldn't be eating it more than twice per month - and she said never, ever eat farmed fish, which I don't. Apparently the PCBs are fat sollueable and dissolve into the same fats that the Omega 3's are found. GRoss.

UH-oh...Thats not good. Hopefully they did this study next to a wood mill! I eat salmon more than twice a month.[:p]
 
quote:Originally posted by fishingbc

thats great lakes salmon

According to the discussion that I had, they were studying BC salmon and she discussed at length the migration up through Alaska where they pick-up the pollution from Asian outflow. Think about the various articles showing whales and various other marine mammals with high pollution levels. They eat salmon and we are the top of the food chain - definitely not just great lakes.

She wasn't suggesting not eating salmon at all (the benefits of the omegas apparently balance the dangers of the pollution somewhat,) just wild salmon in moderation.
 
Back
Top