2026 Fisheries Management " Proposals " for SOG & SVI

Damn few blue dots
Three days in four months.One day at the Fraser in mid July and two days traveling back and forth through Juan de Fuca. Destroy the recreational fishery with sanctuaries and an assortment of closures to allow virtually all of the early and summer Fraser Chinooks to get into the river for you know who. Now DFO want to go in for the kill... What a disgusting use of politics and vote buying.
 
Three days in four months.One day at the Fraser in mid July and two days traveling back and forth through Juan de Fuca. Destroy the recreational fishery with sanctuaries and an assortment of closures to allow virtually all of the early and summer Fraser Chinooks to get into the river for you know who. Now DFO want to go in for the kill... What a disgusting use of politics and vote buying.


Every year inch by inch until they get what they want. It's not what the tax payer wants. Some serious corruption going on. Pulling the tooth reeeeeal slow is thier method.

We're definetly fighing the wrong fight by go after different whale approaches, bubble methods, whale watchers and so on. Just fighting the excuse that isn't actually fighting the root of the problem.

Question is, what to do and how to go about it for a shot at success? I'm personally stuck in brainstorm mode.
 
Last edited:
Three days in four months.One day at the Fraser in mid July and two days traveling back and forth through Juan de Fuca. Destroy the recreational fishery with sanctuaries and an assortment of closures to allow virtually all of the early and summer Fraser Chinooks to get into the river for you know who. Now DFO want to go in for the kill... What a disgusting use of politics and vote buying.
Perhaps someone on here with the time and expertise digging into all sources of available SRKW sighting data to pull together a comprehensive historical account (recent 5 years) of all SRKW sighting locations by month (May to Sept). That data would help frame the efficacy (rather lack thereof) of these closure and fixed sanctuary measures. If someone feels they want to contribute, that data would be a significant contribution to framing a science-based response to the Minister, calling into question the measures proposed.
 
Perhaps someone on here with the time and expertise digging into all sources of available SRKW sighting data to pull together a comprehensive historical account (recent 5 years) of all SRKW sighting locations by month (May to Sept). That data would help frame the efficacy (rather lack thereof) of these closure and fixed sanctuary measures. If someone feels they want to contribute, that data would be a significant contribution to framing a science-based response to the Minister, calling into question the measures proposed.
Here’s a start
 
URGENT

“Fishers” your voice matters. Write letters, Share this post, Tag your MP “Let’s stand together.”

Consultation Sept 17–Oct 31, decision in Feb 2026

(You can copy and paste this letter)

Southern Resident Killer Whale Management Measures
Email letters too:



neil.davis@dfo-mpo.gc.ca

joanne.thompson@parl.gc.ca





Jeff.Kibble@parl.gc.ca

Blaine.Calkins@parl.gc.ca

Mel.Arnold@parl.gc.ca

September 24, 2025

To: Members of Parliament, Media, and Community Stakeholders

Re: Devastating Impacts of Proposed 2026 SRKW Measures on Port Renfrew & Coastal Communities

I am writing to you as someone who has fished these waters my whole life and seen firsthand what these policies mean for small coastal communities. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans’ proposed 2026 Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) measures will not just limit fishing, they will eliminate it.

Loss of Fishing Opportunity
New Chinook closures starting June 1 would wipe out the most important summer season.
Expanded closures at the Fraser Mouth, Gulf Islands, Juan de Fuca Strait, and Swiftsure Bank would block access to nearly all our traditional grounds.
Anglers already do our part with barbless hooks, reduced limits, and non retention rules. Taking away even catch and release sends a devastating message that conservation doesn’t matter, only closures.

Economic & Community Impacts
Port Renfrew’s fishing revenues have already fallen from $26 million to $16.5 million, nearly a 40% loss.
Lodges, guides, marinas, tackle shops, restaurants, and fuel docks all rely on the Chinook season. Without it, businesses close and jobs disappear.
Families lose not just income, but also our food fishery, the salmon that fill our freezers and feed our households. With grocery prices climbing, that loss hits harder than ever.
Community events like the Port Renfrew Marina Derbies and Kids Bullhead Derby, which support hatcheries and bring families together, cannot survive without a fishery.

Why This Matters

Recreational fishing is a $20 billion Canadian industry, but here on the coast it is more than that, it is food on the table, family time, and the heartbeat of our community. Take away the fishery even “catch and release” you take away our way of life.

And it feels unfair. These measures hit recreational and commercial harvest hard, while Indigenous FSC harvest remains exempt. That imbalance leaves small towns like mine carrying the full weight.

My Ask

I am not against protecting whales. But eliminating catch and release and shutting down our food fishery is not balance. It’s destruction.

I ask you to:
Protect whales while also keeping fishing families and communities alive.
Use science, not politics, Chinook returns are improving, and hatcheries are making a difference.
Provide timely, consistent decisions so people can plan ahead instead of being blindsided year after year.

Please understand: this isn’t just about whales and fish. It’s about people, families, and food on the table.

Sincerely,

Gayle Gordon

Blaine Calkins Jeff Angel Kibble Mel Arnold

#SaveOurFishery #FoodFisheryMatters #CatchAndRelease #PortRenfrew #FishingFamilies #ScienceNotPolitics
 
A Crisis for Coastal BC: SRKW Measures Threaten Communities and Livelihoods

Date: September 25, 2025

Why This Matters
We need eyes on this issue. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) is advancing new 2026 Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) prey management measures. While protecting orcas is essential, the current proposals threaten to devastate British Columbia’s coastal communities, fisheries, and tourism economy.
This is more than a policy debate — it’s a crisis unfolding in real time.
What’s Being Proposed
Expanded Salmon Fishing Closures — larger and longer shutdowns in Gulf Islands, Swiftsure Bank, Juan de Fuca Strait, and Fraser River mouth.
Chinook Closures — transition to full bans during peak migration (June–August).
Scrubber Discharge Restrictions — vessel discharge bans in critical SRKW habitat.
The Impacts on BC Communities
Jobs & Incomes Lost: Salmon seasons shortened, fishing families pushed out, and youth/Indigenous workers losing critical seasonal employment.
Tourism at Risk: Communities like Port Renfrew — rebuilt on fishing tourism — could collapse if closures expand.
Industry Collapse: Commercial salmon fleet has already fallen from 6,600 vessels to fewer than 1,000. Many more will disappear.
Consumer Deception: “Sustainable” labels mask the destruction caused by inequitable rules.
The Double Standard
Recreational & Commercial Fishers: Severe restrictions, shrinking seasons, rising costs.
Whale Watching Industry: Virtually unregulated in BC, despite proven disturbance to orca feeding and migration.
Washington vs. Canada: Washington State enforces licenses, time limits, distance requirements, and nearly 100% hatchery marking. BC lags far behind — weak rules, poor monitoring, and only 10% hatchery marking.
Why We Need Action Now
This is not just about fish. It’s about:
The collapse of coastal economies.
The loss of generational fishing families.
The failure of DFO to modernize policy and hatchery practices.
The imbalance of accountability — with fishers paying the price while whale watching and aquaculture escape real restrictions.
What Must Be Done
Hold Whale Watching to Washington Standards — licensing, seasonal limits, and strict enforcement.
Full Mark-Selective Fishery — mark all hatchery fish to protect wild runs.
Science-Based Closures — review outdated restrictions with current data.
Invest in Hatcheries — match Washington’s funding and production for priority salmon stocks.
Address Predation — implement seal and sea lion harvests to protect threatened fish.
Conclusion
British Columbia is at a breaking point.
Without balanced, science-driven management, DFO’s SRKW measures will not only fail to save orcas — they will accelerate the collapse of BC’s fishing industry and coastal communities.
We urgently need Parliament to bring eyes to this crisis, demand accountability, and ensure that policies protect both SRKWs and the people of British Columbia.

Written by: Anthony Rubeo Outdoors
 
Good points raised above in terms of questions to ask MP's in a letter. EVEN better would be if each of us could request a meeting with your local MP so you can raise these concerns and questions, asking your MP to meet with the Fisheries Minister to get answers. Just imagine the impact of several MP's seeking meetings with the Minister asking these questions! We elected these people to represent us in Ottawa - anyone can request a meeting with your MP in their local constituency office. Its easy to complain here on this forum - but if you really want to make a difference, meet with your local MP demanding answers.
 
Good points raised above in terms of questions to ask MP's in a letter. EVEN better would be if each of us could request a meeting with your local MP so you can raise these concerns and questions, asking your MP to meet with the Fisheries Minister to get answers. Just imagine the impact of several MP's seeking meetings with the Minister asking these questions! We elected these people to represent us in Ottawa - anyone can request a meeting with your MP in their local constituency office. Its easy to complain here on this forum - but if you really want to make a difference, meet with your local MP demanding answers.
The bonus of going through your MP to ask the Minister a question is the dreaded Ministerial inquiry. Essentially the Minister tells their staff to drop tools provide an answer. You won’t get that response any other way! Let’s face it these people want to get re-elected and the opposition likes to have ammunition to use against them. Make sure you know what you’re talking about, have done your research and verified your facts, you don’t want to burn those who are taking up your cause.
 
Honestly i think our best bet is to write letters to Carney saying he is doubling down on Trudeau destructive policy's to close the economy and destroying business.

here is what AI did, adjust it to suit your needs

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Province, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]

September 26, 2025


The Right Honourable Mark Carney
Prime Minister of Canada
Office of the Prime Minister and Privy Council
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2


Dear Prime Minister Carney,


I am writing to you as a concerned Canadian citizen and recreational fisher to express my deep alarm over the proposed further expansion of fishing closures intended to protect the Southern Resident Killer Whales (SRKWs). These measures, as outlined in the Department of Fisheries and Oceans' (DFO) recent proposals for 2026, represent a continuation—and indeed a doubling down—on the restrictive policies established under the previous Trudeau administration. While the plight of the SRKWs is undoubtedly serious, with their population hovering at just 73 individuals, escalating these closures will inflict disproportionate and irreversible harm on Canada's recreational fishing community, undermining livelihoods, local economies, and our shared connection to the ocean.


The Trudeau government's SRKW recovery strategy, initiated in 2019 and expanded through 2024 and 2025, has already imposed mandatory area-based closures for both recreational and commercial salmon fishing in critical SRKW foraging areas, such as Juan de Fuca Strait, Fraser River Mouth and Swiftsure Bank. These include seasonal bans on Chinook salmon harvesting—the SRKWs' primary prey—from late spring through fall, effectively shuttering prime recreational fishing windows until November 30 each year. The 2025 measures alone introduced new speed-restricted zones and temporary cease-fishing directives, further limiting access to these waters. Now, with DFO's 2026 proposals threatening even broader restrictions, we risk compounding these impacts without clear evidence that such blanket closures are the most effective path to SRKW recovery. An independent science panel's recent report, while calling for bold action, emphasizes targeted interventions like prey enhancement and vessel management over indefinite fishing bans.


This approach not only echoes but amplifies the Trudeau-era focus on top-down environmental mandates that prioritize symbolic gestures over balanced, evidence-based solutions. Recreational fishing in British Columbia alone supports over 300,000 participants and generates approximately $1.2 billion in annual economic activity, sustaining coastal communities from Victoria to Prince Rupert. Yet, the proposed expansions—such as new Chinook closures starting June 1—would eradicate the most vital summer fishing season, leading to lost opportunities, reduced tourism revenue, and heightened frustration among anglers who already comply with strict catch-and-release protocols in sensitive areas. These closures disproportionately burden everyday Canadians who fish for sustenance, family tradition, and mental well-being, while commercial interests and pinniped predation on salmon—another key threat to SRKWs—receive comparatively less scrutiny. In essence, we are sacrificing a vibrant, regulated sector to address symptoms of broader ecosystem decline, without investing sufficiently in alternatives like hatchery enhancements or marine protected areas that could benefit both whales and fishers.


As Canada's new Prime Minister, with your renowned expertise in sustainable economics and global environmental challenges, I urge you to reconsider these expansions. Please direct DFO to:


  1. Conduct a comprehensive socioeconomic impact assessment on recreational fishing before implementing further closures.
  2. Prioritize collaborative solutions, such as increased funding for Chinook salmon restoration and non-lethal pinniped management, as recommended by stakeholders.
  3. Engage directly with recreational fishing associations to co-develop measures that protect SRKWs without eroding public support for conservation.

The SRKWs deserve our protection, but so does the fabric of coastal life that sustains us all. By charting a more equitable course, your government can lead the world in harmonizing environmental stewardship with economic vitality. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this further and can be reached at the contact information above.


Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. I look forward to your response.


Sincerely,


[Your Full Name][Your Title/ Affiliation, if applicable, e.g., Recreational Angler and BC Resident]
Ha Carney is bankrupting Canada and the Liberals have been driving it into the ground for over 8 years. Do you think he's going to read your email as he hangs out in Europe?
 
Ha Carney is bankrupting Canada and the Liberals have been driving it into the ground for over 8 years. Do you think he's going to read your email as he hangs out in Europe?

I’ve always gotten a response eventually, like it or not we have 3 more years and this is just a small piece the allocation priority will shape our fishery like never before
 
I’ve always gotten a response eventually, like it or not we have 3 more years and this is just a small piece the allocation priority will shape our fishery like never before
Won’t be 3 years. NDP learned a lesson a bit and bloc will gain support and has been since election especially due to the liberals attack on the non withstanding clause provincially.

Fall 2026 or spring 2027 election.
 
Ha Carney is bankrupting Canada and the Liberals have been driving it into the ground for over 8 years. Do you think he's going to read your email as he hangs out in Europe?
All the more reason to meet with your local MP to ask questions and seek their support for taking these concerns forward to the Fisheries Minister on your behalf as a concerned constituent. Make the political process work for you. Letters are better than petitions, and personal meetings with MP's tops letters IMO.
 
All the MPs over here are all liberals. Jill McKnight for Delta and ohh boy, we got the one and only Gregor Robertson. Last time I talked to that bozo was when he was mayor of vancouver. I asked him why he spent all the road tax money on bike lanes and green paint. Let's just say he didn't have a clear answer.
 
Perhaps someone on here with the time and expertise digging into all sources of available SRKW sighting data to pull together a comprehensive historical account (recent 5 years) of all SRKW sighting locations by month (May to Sept). That data would help frame the efficacy (rather lack thereof) of these closure and fixed sanctuary measures. If someone feels they want to contribute, that data would be a significant contribution to framing a science-based response to the Minister, calling into question the measures proposed.
In the works
 
Good points raised above in terms of questions to ask MP's in a letter. EVEN better would be if each of us could request a meeting with your local MP so you can raise these concerns and questions, asking your MP to meet with the Fisheries Minister to get answers. Just imagine the impact of several MP's seeking meetings with the Minister asking these questions! We elected these people to represent us in Ottawa - anyone can request a meeting with your MP in their local constituency office. Its easy to complain here on this forum - but if you really want to make a difference, meet with your local MP demanding answers.
 
Back
Top