This is the same fishery that has close to a million pounds of Canadian chinooks as a by catch. Ooops.
A report last week from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) shows the annual survey of biomass of Alaska pollock found in the mid-water levels of the Bering Sea is half of what is was in 2007.
But the numbers sound much worse than their reality and don't indicate overfishing of the resource, says the National Marine Fisheries Service researcher who conducted the survey.
Still, in an Oct. 20 letter, Greenpeace sent out a fund-raising plea that read: "The National Marine Fisheries Service just revealed that populations of Alaska pollock, the largest food fishery in the world, have dropped 50 percent since last year. ... Please help us prevent the collapse of our fisheries by making a generous gift today. ... This is clear evidence that we need to act and we need to act now: please click here to donate."
In a blog entry Tuesday on their Web site, the National Fisheries Institute (NFI) took aim at Greenpeace -- which it has sparred with over the group's ranking of retailers' seafood purchasing policies -- saying it is disingenuous of the group to create a scare story about pollock to raise funds.
"Greenpeace is using an erroneous scare story that it concocted to goad supporters into forking over their hard earned money to help stem the tide of crisis that it invented," NFI said. "So, there you have it, once again in Greenpeace's playbook half-truths and fundraising goals trump ground truth science."
Because ocean temperatures were cold again for the third straight year, more pollock kept closer to the ocean floor than they normally would, skewing the survey results, Jim Ianelli, NMFS assessment scientist, told IntraFish last week.
Asked if there was overfishing of Alaska pollock, Ianelli said: “Not by any measure for this upcoming season.”
Greenpeace blamed the lower survey numbers on overfishing and possible mismanagement of the resource -- claims those in the pollock industry scoff at.
"Greenpeace’s statement was something the industry had come to expect when the biomass takes a dip," Jim Gimore of the At-sea Processors Association last week told IntraFish. “They come in and say ‘You need to do something drastic here.’ Then they recede into the woodwork, like they did four or five years ago when the stocks was at its all time high.”
Gilmore dismissed the statement from Jeremy Jackson, director of the Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, cited by Greenpeace in which Jackson said economic pressures to keep on fishing at such high levels have “overwhelmed common sense.”
“Whoever Jeremy Jackson is, he can’t be that familiar with the fisheries management of Alaska,” said Gilmore. “I don’t know when the fishing industry has ever pressured the scientists.”
A report last week from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) shows the annual survey of biomass of Alaska pollock found in the mid-water levels of the Bering Sea is half of what is was in 2007.
But the numbers sound much worse than their reality and don't indicate overfishing of the resource, says the National Marine Fisheries Service researcher who conducted the survey.
Still, in an Oct. 20 letter, Greenpeace sent out a fund-raising plea that read: "The National Marine Fisheries Service just revealed that populations of Alaska pollock, the largest food fishery in the world, have dropped 50 percent since last year. ... Please help us prevent the collapse of our fisheries by making a generous gift today. ... This is clear evidence that we need to act and we need to act now: please click here to donate."
In a blog entry Tuesday on their Web site, the National Fisheries Institute (NFI) took aim at Greenpeace -- which it has sparred with over the group's ranking of retailers' seafood purchasing policies -- saying it is disingenuous of the group to create a scare story about pollock to raise funds.
"Greenpeace is using an erroneous scare story that it concocted to goad supporters into forking over their hard earned money to help stem the tide of crisis that it invented," NFI said. "So, there you have it, once again in Greenpeace's playbook half-truths and fundraising goals trump ground truth science."
Because ocean temperatures were cold again for the third straight year, more pollock kept closer to the ocean floor than they normally would, skewing the survey results, Jim Ianelli, NMFS assessment scientist, told IntraFish last week.
Asked if there was overfishing of Alaska pollock, Ianelli said: “Not by any measure for this upcoming season.”
Greenpeace blamed the lower survey numbers on overfishing and possible mismanagement of the resource -- claims those in the pollock industry scoff at.
"Greenpeace’s statement was something the industry had come to expect when the biomass takes a dip," Jim Gimore of the At-sea Processors Association last week told IntraFish. “They come in and say ‘You need to do something drastic here.’ Then they recede into the woodwork, like they did four or five years ago when the stocks was at its all time high.”
Gilmore dismissed the statement from Jeremy Jackson, director of the Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, cited by Greenpeace in which Jackson said economic pressures to keep on fishing at such high levels have “overwhelmed common sense.”
“Whoever Jeremy Jackson is, he can’t be that familiar with the fisheries management of Alaska,” said Gilmore. “I don’t know when the fishing industry has ever pressured the scientists.”